Editorial disclosure
The desk publishes an editorial disclosure covering sponsored placements, affiliate links, paid partnerships, and the conflict-of-interest policy that governs our reviews of fantasy operators.
What we disclose
The desk accepts no payment from fantasy operators in exchange for review coverage or for inclusion or exclusion from any list. Sponsored placements (editorial articles funded by a partner) are labelled at the top of the article. Affiliate links, if any, are also labelled. We commit to a quarterly conflict-of-interest review.
Continue with the desk
Walk through the section, then build your XI.On disclosure, walk through the section, then build your XI.
Explore the desk
Disclosure categories
Sponsored placements: editorial articles funded by a partner. Labelled with "Sponsored" at the top of the article, the partner name, and the partnership scope. Sponsored articles are editorially independent — the partner does not see the content before publication.
Affiliate links: if a hub or article contains affiliate links to a fantasy operator, the link is labelled "Affiliate". Affiliate links earn the desk a small commission on sign-ups or contest entries. Affiliate links do not change the editorial content.
Operator reviews: the desk does not accept payment from operators in exchange for review coverage. Operators cannot pay to be reviewed, included in the directory, or excluded from any list.
Reader submissions: reader-submitted transaction data is anonymised and never attributed unless the reader explicitly opts in. Reader-submitted corrections are honoured within 7 days of verification.
Partnerships: partnerships are disclosed at the bottom of every article or operator page where the partnership is material to the content. The partnerships email is honoured within 5 business days.
Quarterly conflict-of-interest review: the desk publishes a quarterly review of conflicts of interest. The next review runs at the start of the next calendar quarter.
Disclosure scenarios
Sponsored placements
Labelled with "Sponsored" at the top of the article. Editorially independent.
Affiliate links
Labelled "Affiliate". Small commission on sign-ups. Editorial content unchanged.
Operator reviews
No payment from operators for coverage. Cannot pay for review or exclusion.
Reader submissions
Anonymised by default. Opt-in attribution. Verified corrections within 7 days.
Partnerships
Disclosed at the bottom of relevant articles. Material to content.
Quarterly CoI review
Published quarterly. Next review at the start of the next calendar quarter.
Visual reference frames — generated inline.Visual reference frames — generated inline This is why the disclosure desk treats it as a baseline.
Frequently asked questions
Can operators pay for review coverage?
No. Operators cannot pay for review or exclusion.
Are sponsored placements editorially independent?
Yes. Partners do not see content before publication.
Do affiliate links change editorial content?
No. Affiliate links do not affect the editorial content or the desk’s recommendations.
How are reader submissions handled?
Anonymised by default. Opt-in attribution. Verified corrections within 7 days.
When is the next conflict-of-interest review?
Start of the next calendar quarter.
How do I report a potential conflict of interest?
Email editorial@
Continue reading
Responsible play note
Fantasy contests are skill-based products intended as entertainment for adults aged 18+. Always set deposit and time limits before you start. Read our Responsible Play policy.On disclosure, fantasy contests are skill-based products intended as entertainment for adults aged 18+. For the disclosure desk, always set deposit and time limits before you start. Within the SportsCricket Fantasy framework, read our Responsible Play policy.
Read the disclosure with intent
Sponsored placements, affiliate links, operator reviews, reader submissions, partnerships, quarterly review.
From the rest of the desk
Selected reading from the past eight weeks
Editorial notes the desk has published on adjacent topics. Each piece links back to the methodology that informs the operator reviews, the captain pick calibration, and the prediction desk output.Editorial notes the desk has published on adjacent topics This is why the disclosure desk treats it as a baseline. Each piece links back to the methodology that informs the operator reviews, the captain pick calibration, and the prediction desk output.
Calibration in low-data tournaments
Low-data tournaments — bilateral T20Is, regional qualifiers, the early rounds of a multi-stage event — are the toughest calibration environment. Venue sample size is small, batter form windows are short, and the bowler rotation churns quickly. The desk treats low-data tournaments as a separate prediction target. We publish confidence bands that are wider than the IPL cycle, and we tilt the captain-card weight toward role certainty rather than form. The intuition is that role certainty is the most stable signal when sample size is small.Low-data tournaments — bilateral T20Is, regional qualifiers, the early rounds of a multi-stage event — are the toughest calibration environment This is why the disclosure desk treats it as a baseline. Venue sample size is small, batter form windows are short, and the bowler rotation churns quickly. On disclosure, the desk treats low-data tournaments as a separate prediction target. For the disclosure desk, we publish confidence bands that are wider than the IPL cycle, and we tilt the captain-card weight toward role certainty rather than form. Within the SportsCricket Fantasy framework, the intuition is that role certainty is the most stable signal when sample size is small.
The variance ride: a season-long view
Variance is part of fantasy. A season-long view helps: across a 74-fixture IPL, a 60% captain hit rate at 2x multiplier produces roughly 150-180 differential points per entry. A 75% hit rate at 2x multiplier produces 200-260. The difference between hitting the median and hitting the upside is typically one or two correctly calibrated differential picks per week. We publish a monthly variance review with the desk’s view on whether the season is running hot or cold relative to the model baseline.Variance is part of fantasy This is why the disclosure desk treats it as a baseline. A season-long view helps: across a 74-fixture IPL, a 60% captain hit rate at 2x multiplier produces roughly 150-180 differential points per entry. On disclosure, a 75% hit rate at 2x multiplier produces 200-260. For the disclosure desk, the difference between hitting the median and hitting the upside is typically one or two correctly calibrated differential picks per week. Within the SportsCricket Fantasy framework, we publish a monthly variance review with the desk’s view on whether the season is running hot or cold relative to the model baseline.
Operator consolidation: a 2026 reading list
Three editor-recommended deep dives on the changing operator landscape. The first covers regulatory consolidation at the state level — how state-level gaming acts are converging on the “predominance of skill” standard. The second covers operator-side M&A activity — which operators have been acquired, which have raised capital, and how the operator-side wallet behaviour has shifted. The third covers the impact on contest depth — whether the operator consolidation has reduced the variety of contest tiers, and whether the prize pool distribution has tightened.Three editor-recommended deep dives on the changing operator landscape This is why the disclosure desk treats it as a baseline. The first covers regulatory consolidation at the state level — how state-level gaming acts are converging on the “predominance of skill” standard. On disclosure, the second covers operator-side M&A activity — which operators have been acquired, which have raised capital, and how the operator-side wallet behaviour has shifted. For the disclosure desk, the third covers the impact on contest depth — whether the operator consolidation has reduced the variety of contest tiers, and whether the prize pool distribution has tightened.
How these notes connect back to the methodology
Each archive note has been audited against the editorial methodology on the Review hub. The desk does not republish sister-site content; each note is desk-original. The 4-factor captain model and the venue-and-match-up prediction model are consistent across the archive, so the recommendations on tournament selection, captain calibration, and contest-tier choice are cross-checked against the same backbone.Each archive note has been audited against the editorial methodology on the Review hub This is why the disclosure desk treats it as a baseline. The desk does not republish sister-site content; each note is desk-original. On disclosure, the 4-factor captain model and the venue-and-match-up prediction model are consistent across the archive, so the recommendations on tournament selection, captain calibration, and contest-tier choice are cross-checked against the same backbone.
Detailed disclosure categories
The disclosure policy covers four categories. Each is treated separately because the conflict-of-interest profile of each is different.
Category 1 — Sponsored placements. Editorial articles funded by a partner. Labelled with Sponsored at the top of the article, the partner name, and the partnership scope. Sponsored articles are editorially independent — the partner does not see the content before publication, and the desk does not change its recommendations to please the sponsor. Sponsored placements account for less than 15% of the desk published content.
Category 2 — Affiliate links. Hubs or articles that contain affiliate links to a fantasy operator. The link is labelled Affiliate. Affiliate links earn the desk a small commission on sign-ups or contest entries. Affiliate links do not change the editorial content or the desk recommendations. The desk publishes its affiliate partners at the bottom of the relevant hub.
Category 3 — Operator reviews. The desk does not accept payment from operators in exchange for review coverage. Operators cannot pay to be reviewed, included in the directory, or excluded from any list. Operator reviews are audited quarterly, and the test transactions are desk-conducted, not operator-provided.
Category 4 — Reader submissions. Reader-submitted transaction data is anonymised by default and never attributed unless the reader explicitly opts in. Reader-submitted corrections are honoured within 7 days of verification. Reader-submitted disagreements with the desk methodology are honoured with a desk-written response published on the relevant hub.
The desk publishes a quarterly conflict-of-interest review. The next review runs at the start of the next calendar quarter, and the publication is announced on the blog and via the weekly digest.
Quarterly conflict-of-interest review template
The quarterly CoI review template covers four sections: sponsored placement count and partner names, affiliate link count and operator names, operator review cases and any flagged method conflicts, reader-submitted correction cases. Each section is published with a desk-written summary.
Sponsored placements are reviewed for sponsor-side feedback. We track whether any sponsor pushed back on editorial recommendations (none in the past two quarters). Affiliate links are reviewed for click-through and conversion rates. Operator reviews are reviewed for any method conflict (none in the past three quarters). Reader-submitted corrections are reviewed for accuracy and desk response time.
Readers who follow disclosure on SportsCricketFantasy often want to compare it against similar editorial coverage. Our long-form archive sits next to live fixtures so the same desk covers pre-match, mid-match, and post-match analysis without losing context.
Editorial standards require us to keep methodology transparent. Every chart, every ranking, and every projection lives next to its source data so the model output is reproducible. That discipline is the reason our pieces age better than marketing-led write-ups.Editorial standards require us to keep methodology transparent This is why the disclosure desk treats it as a baseline. Every chart, every ranking, and every projection lives next to its source data so the model output is reproducible. On disclosure, that discipline is the reason our pieces age better than marketing-led write-ups.
For first-time visitors, the quickest way to feel our coverage is to read two contrasting sections side by side. The first section anchors the topic with definitions and verifiable sources. The second section shows how the topic moves during a live match window. Together they form the editorial spine of SportsCricketFantasy.For first-time visitors, the quickest way to feel our coverage is to read two contrasting sections side by side This is why the disclosure desk treats it as a baseline. The first section anchors the topic with definitions and verifiable sources. On disclosure, the second section shows how the topic moves during a live match window. For the disclosure desk, together they form the editorial spine of SportsCricketFantasy.